Case study · Designing job-specific frameworks
English for museum roles: how can training be built from real work?
In a cultural institution, 'speaking English' does not mean the same thing for a ticket office agent, a guide, a professional acting as courier for artworks or a curator. A generic programme stays too far removed from the job, particularly for beginner staff who need phrases they can use straight away.
In short
Before choosing content, Linguaphone identifies what each role needs to be able to do in English: who staff speak to, communication goals, frequent or sensitive situations, documents used. Learners are then grouped by similarity of use rather than by hierarchical level, with short materials they can consult on the job, so that practice stays useful after the session.
The starting point
The initial challenge
The institution welcomes an international public and relies on several categories of staff: reception and ticket office agents, some of them beginners, guides responsible for visitor engagement, and managers and curators involved in expert exchanges. Belonging to the same institution is therefore not enough to define a common programme.
Early learning has to be usable straight away, without restricting advanced profiles to reception dialogues. The organisation must also respect the rhythms of the site and be able to continue during closure periods.
The challenge to solve
- Identifying the situations specific to each role
- Making training accessible to staff who are sometimes beginners
- Developing expert-level English for managers and curators
- Producing tools that can be used after the session
- Maintaining continuity remotely when in-person sessions are not possible
- Language
- English
- Audience
- Reception, ticket office and security staff, guides, managers and curators
- Expressed need
- Operational English for every role, from reception to expert level
Our answer
The solution deployed
The programme starts from an analysis of each role's work situations: welcoming, informing, directing, presenting an artwork, applying an instruction, talking with an expert counterpart. Learners are grouped by similarity of situations, and a heritage glossary and a booklet for use on the job secure the transfer after the session.
Management
- Programmes organised by role
- Training on site, as close as possible to the workstations
- Remote continuity during closure periods
- Individual programmes for managers
Teaching
- Analysis of situations by role: ticket office, reception, security, tours, expertise
- Tailor-made glossary of heritage and exhibitions
- Booklet and digital materials for use on the job
- Expert-level English for managers: artwork courier missions, sponsorship, conferences
- On site
- Remote
- On-the-job materials
The programme in figures
- 75%
- of sessions held in person
- 3 years
- of evaluations tracked
The outcome
The results
- A collaboration renewed over the long term: the institution keeps renewing its trust in us because the programme meets its teams' needs
- A programme that held up during closures to the public, thanks to the switch to remote sessions
Indicators for 2023, 2024 and 2025
- 93%
- Overall satisfaction
- 4.8/5
- Trainer satisfaction
- 92%
- Recommendation rate
What followed
A long-standing collaboration, renewed and maintained remotely during periods of closure to the public.
What this case shows
Starting from real work makes it possible to build training with a dual skill set, language and job, rather than a generic programme. The method applies to any organisation where several roles face distinct communication situations.
Three conditions for success
- 1 Observe or describe communication situations precisely before writing the content.
- 2 Group learners by similarity of use, not only by hierarchical level.
- 3 Create short, easy-to-consult materials that help transfer to the job.
Facing the same challenge? the first step is to replace the question 'what English should we teach?' with 'what does each role need to be able to do in English?'. The answer then shapes the framework and the programmes.
Learner feedback
The energy, and the search for topics fully suited to our work in museums. End-of-course evaluation · cultural sector
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Go further
How we measure: every figure on this page comes from the end-of-course evaluations completed by learners (2023, 2024 and 2025). Trainer satisfaction is the average of four criteria (delivery, listening, encouragement, clarity); the recommendation rate is the share of ratings of 4 or 5 out of 5. This case study is illustrative: the client is not named and is described in deliberately general terms.